CDFAM Computational Design Symposium — Washington DC 2026
Daniel Hambleton · Metafold
Generative AI is rapidly expanding what designers and engineers can create in 3D, but visual plausibility is not the same as geometric fidelity. This presentation asks a practical validation question: how close are AI-generated CAD models really to a target desired shape?
We introduce a feature-vector workflow using the Metafold Shape Similarity technology to compare generated models against reference targets. Each model is encoded into a geometric feature vector, enabling direct comparison through aggregate similarity scores, coordinate-level distance ribbons, scale-normalized metrics, and side-by-side 3D previews. The result is a repeatable method for moving beyond “looks right” evaluation toward measurable shape correspondence.
Using examples from current 3D generative design workflows, the talk demonstrates how feature vectors can expose where a generated model preserves intent, where it drifts, and which geometric features contribute most to the gap.
This approach offers a lightweight validation layer for AI-assisted CAD: fast enough for iteration, interpretable enough for engineering review, and concrete enough to support model benchmarking.
Links
Search the full text of every recorded CDFAM presentation
